30-second shorts that look hand-edited.
Type a topic. Get a short with a real hook, a visual matched to every line, an editor's cut and captions that hit on the word. Nothing templated, nothing you could not post today.
- One free video
- No watermark
- No card
- From $10 a week
A real render. Nothing staged, nothing hand-fixed.
Frames from real renders. Nothing staged.
One idea in. A video you would post, out.
Or paste a script. One line is enough; we write a hook with a point of view.
Five ranked openings. Edit any line. Nothing renders until you say so.
Script, voice, visuals, cut. About three minutes. Then swap any scene for free.
Most tools grab the first stock clip that shares a word. We reject it and make the right picture.
Every line gets stock candidates scored against what is actually being said. Below the bar, an art-directed image is generated instead, checked by a second model, and only then shipped. Drag to compare.
Why it doesn't look like AI slop
The tells people complain about in every review of the other tools, removed one by one.
Stock, 31% matchRejectedGenerated for the lineShippedEvery scene is generated or chosen for the exact sentence being spoken, then a second model checks it. No Roman emperor when the script says Greek statue.
Word timings come from the voice model itself. Pages break on phrases, never on 'the', with a stroke or scrim when the frame is bright.
Cuts land on stressed words and punctuation, every 1.7 to 2.6 seconds. Transitions overlap. Nothing ever reveals from black.
A credit is used only when a finished video passes quality check. Failed or held-back renders cost nothing, ever.
Hook style, structure, captions, grade, music and pacing vary per video and avoid what your last four used.
1
2
3
4
5
6Swap any scene's visual, rewrite and re-record a line, change captions or music. Only what changed re-renders, in about a minute.
Real output, no cherry-picking
Every clip here came straight out of the pipeline. Hover or tap to play.
YouTube now demonetises channels that post the same video with different words. So no two of yours are built the same.
Hook framework, structure, caption style, colour grade, music and pacing rotate per video and avoid your last four.
No stock loops. Each line gets its own matched picture, and a second model rejects the wrong ones before render.
You pick the hook and can rewrite any line. Human editorial decisions are exactly what the policy asks for.
A week or a month. Either way you only pay for videos that pass.
One free video first, full quality. Then pick the rhythm your channel posts at. Cancel in one click.
For a channel that posts daily. Start and stop any week.
The best rate. Thirty videos, renewed monthly.
- A credit is used only when a video passes quality check
- Free re-rolls, re-records, caption and music changes
- 1080×1920, no watermark
- Cards, UPI, Apple Pay and Google Pay
| CookShorts | Typical AI shorts tool | Freelance editor | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $10 a week or $25 a month | $19 to $39 a month | $600+ a month |
| Videos | 7 a week or 30 a month | 13 to 30, one series | 4 to 8 |
| Per video | $0.83 to $1.43 | $1 to $1.50 | $75 to $150 |
| Visual matched to each line | yes, checked | keyword stock | yes |
| Word-synced captions | 5 styles, phrase-aware | 1 to 3 styles | yes |
| Per-scene re-rolls | free | full regenerate | revision rounds |
| Failed render charged | never | usually | n/a |
| Varies per video | by design | template | depends |
Typical-tool figures are the Sept 2026 entry tiers of AutoShorts, Faceless.video, StoryShort and Faceless.so. Editor rates are US freelance marketplace medians.
Questions people ask before the first video
Anything else, write to hello@cookshorts.video. A person answers.
Your first one is free. Full quality.
A few minutes from a topic to a short you would actually post. If it isn't, it didn't cost you anything.